Editorial Policy

Our commitments

We publish original consumer information that is accurate, locally relevant, useful and transparent about its evidence. Commercial relationships do not override safety findings.

Source rules

We prioritise:

1. official public records;
2. operator terms and policies;
3. provider paytables and technical documentation;
4. payment-provider information;
5. dated first-hand tests;
6. reliable independent evidence;
7. competitor pages only as secondary claims.

A supplied comparison site can tell us what it says. It cannot prove local market status by itself.

Originality

Writers work from an intent brief and evidence sheet. They may not copy, translate or line-by-line paraphrase a competitor. We do not preserve another page’s paragraph sequence or unique examples.

Every page must add original decision support such as a calculation, checklist, comparison, troubleshooting flow or source-backed explanation.

Prohibited claims

We do not publish:

• guaranteed win, income or payout;
• “due”, “hot” or predictive slot systems;
• offshore status as a benefit for bypassing exclusion;
• unverified “official” domain;
• unconditional “safe” or “legal” labels;
• invented ratings, downloads, tests or user quotations;
• urgency that is not present in verified terms;
• “best” without a visible methodology.

Localisation

UK content uses British English and local consumer terminology. Dutch content is independently researched and written around Netherlands search intent, official terminology and Cruks. Dutch pages are not literal UK translations.

Updates and corrections

We show “checked” and “updated” dates. A material correction explains what changed. Bonus pages use a visible snapshot time; high-risk checks are recorded in the source log.

Reader safety

Responsible-gambling pages contain no commercial call to action. Slot education distinguishes probability from prediction. We do not target minors or frame gambling as financial improvement.